|
|
Post by craig on May 23, 2011 14:00:02 GMT -8
when i came to lvfixed, it had like 60 pages of 40 posts i had to go through to make sure i didn't repost anything. haha. vanilla.
|
|
|
|
Post by josr on May 23, 2011 22:59:39 GMT -8
my bad next time ill look through all the pages
|
|
|
|
Post by Rushing on May 23, 2011 23:31:25 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by extrasketchy on May 23, 2011 23:32:01 GMT -8
my bad next time ill look through all the pages  YEAH JERK! Way to ruin the internet. |
|
|
|
Post by craig on May 24, 2011 7:02:47 GMT -8
my bad next time ill look through all the pages haha no problem man. whatever feels good, man. This is what I says I says, first of all change the bar angle a bit. then wrap them. then i says, get a two cross front wheel. i just don't like the look of radially laced wheels, especially with that many spokes, especially with high flange hubs. anyone agree? |
|
|
|
Post by rabbi on May 24, 2011 8:54:02 GMT -8
the person who rides that bike only puts their hands on the tops anyways.
|
|
|
|
Post by topet on May 24, 2011 18:09:47 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by remspeedwagon on May 24, 2011 18:22:47 GMT -8
|
|
sids
chump
I posted 500 times and all I got was this stupid shirt.
Posts: 1,224
|
Post by sids on May 25, 2011 14:48:35 GMT -8
Well I was going to post this in the craigslist thread but I can't even get into it on chrome because there is not multiple pages and it is not a new thread so I'll post it here, which is almost as fitting washingtondc.craigslist.org/doc/mis/2402072162.html |
|
|
|
Post by extrasketchy on May 26, 2011 13:36:46 GMT -8
 Time for some DP in this porn thread. |
|
|
|
Post by josr on May 26, 2011 14:46:14 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by rabbi on May 26, 2011 16:55:31 GMT -8
as cool as those paul racks look, they are completely useless.
|
|
|
|
Post by craig on May 26, 2011 16:59:24 GMT -8
regardless, that's a pretty nice setup, although a non-radial front would be cool. and no risers
|
|
|
|
Post by extrasketchy on May 26, 2011 18:00:02 GMT -8
as cool as those paul racks look, they are completely useless.  False! |
|
|
|
Post by rabbi on May 26, 2011 18:56:56 GMT -8
i mean they have a weight limit of 25lbs. a cetma holds 70lbs+ and costs half of what a paul does.
|
|
|
|
Post by remspeedwagon on May 26, 2011 20:51:26 GMT -8
Not everyone needs to hold 70 lbs on their handlebars. Sorry,
|
|
|
|
Post by rabbi on May 26, 2011 21:08:18 GMT -8
25lbs isn't a lot. especially for $200+.
|
|
|
|
Post by brianburke on May 27, 2011 1:04:34 GMT -8
That'd be fine for me. All I would need to carry are the monthly condom run boxes. It's not like I need more than 25 pounds of...... Ohhh.. Nvm.
|
|
|
|
Post by extrasketchy on May 27, 2011 1:22:09 GMT -8
i mean they have a weight limit of 25lbs. a cetma holds 70lbs+ and costs half of what a paul does. I agreed that is why there is only a loaf bread, wounder bread at that not much mass. |
|
|
|
Post by craig on May 27, 2011 5:56:19 GMT -8
i think he's just pointing out the senselessness of buying a rack that can only hold a third of what the same rack can hold for half the price?
|
|
|
|
Post by nlinealac on May 27, 2011 11:42:25 GMT -8
That rack could hold like a hella skinny bitch!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by extrasketchy on May 27, 2011 14:14:57 GMT -8
That rack could hold like a hella skinny bitch!!!  You're prolly right. Skinny enough? |
|
|
|
Post by josr on May 30, 2011 17:43:21 GMT -8
 is this porn worthy? im not to sure because of that saddle...... |
|
|
|
Post by brianburke on May 30, 2011 18:26:57 GMT -8
Only the frame is. The parts are shit.
|
|
|
|
Post by extrasketchy on May 30, 2011 19:29:35 GMT -8
I got off on that rusty one in the back, so yes.
|
|
|
|
Post by topet on May 30, 2011 21:17:08 GMT -8
that frame is incredible
|
|
|
|
Post by extrasketchy on Jun 1, 2011 5:06:14 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by justsaying on Jun 1, 2011 12:22:06 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by extrasketchy on Jun 1, 2011 12:55:16 GMT -8
Does anyone know if that pinstriping is done by hand?
|
|
|
|
Post by josr on Jun 1, 2011 12:59:45 GMT -8
it is indeed done by hand
|
|
